? Qu? is better? C Cannon or Nikon? Digital cameras?

Nikon
hands down

nikonnnnnnn

NIKON!
I have a Nikon and I love it!

They are both pretty equal, but I prefer Nikon

Nikon! that is the kind of camera i have and i love it! it works so well and easy to use!

i’m going to have to say Cannon fo sure!!!!

Ricoh, but good old Samsung makes the best all-rounder digital camera in my opinion.

cannon eos rebel
http://www.adtan.com/reviews/images/canon-rebel-xt.jpg

For a photographer that is not of as serious caliber go with the Cannon

I prefer nikon all around, but then again, i prefer film over digital, so there ya go.

Nikon, even though the quality if pictures is better on a Canon camera

I have a cannon camera and it’s pretty good, I don’t know about nikon sorry

When comparing shutter speeds, you will see that the professional cameras from both Nikon and Canon (not cannon … that is a military weapon) have shutter speeds of 1/8,000th second. Entry level Nikon and Canon cameras have top shutter speeds of 1/4,000th of a second.

When choosing a camera system, the extent of the system is much more important than any one camera body. While in the days of shooting film, a camera body could last decades, digital SLR’s have a 18-24 month life span for professional’s, three to five years for advanced amateurs. Not because they will wear-out, but because of the advancement of technology.

Choose your system well, because you are in a sense, marrying it. Changing to a different camera system can be very expensive … in my case, it would cost me over $ 50,000 to replace all my camera bodies and lenses. Not a good business decision.

NIKON IS SO MUCH BETTER.
IT HAS A BETTER ZOOM.
BETTER DIGITAL PHOTOS.
IT TAKES BETTER SPORTS PICS/MOVING PICS TOO.
SO OVERALL IS MUCH BETER THAN CANNON.

Unfortunately the Nikon and Canon DSLRs with interchangeable lenses do not have:

1. Image stabilization built into the body and you have to pay extra for auxiliary image stabilized lenses which in often fairly expensive;
2. The initial normal lense is not a long focal length zoom lense so in order to make up for the shortness, you have to purchase another telephoto lense;
3. Video movie with sound capability;
4. Low light sensivity is limited because the ASA is limited to 3200 at best.

A bridge point and shoot digital camera provides all the features listed above and is a far better bargain than a Nikon D-Series or a Canon Rebel DSLR.

If you are really on a budget and want the best quality for the money, check out the P&S Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 which has more features than most pro DSLRs that require auxiliary lenses not even equal to the single initial full-range lense that comes with the FZ28. It is reviewed at:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/2008_reviews/panasonic_fz28.html

It just came out on November 4, 2008.

It’s an all-in-one 10.1 megapixel DSLR camera which includes (i) built-in image stabilization; (ii) HDTV quality video [Quicktime]; (iii) a 18x zoom [27 - 486 mm (35mm equiv.)] “Leica” lense for nature photography; (iv) up to 0.39 inch macro option; (v) up to 6400 ASA; (vi) takes up to 380 pictures per 120 min. battery charge; (vii) has a “burst speed” of 13 fps; and sells new for $ 270 at amazon.com.

Here’s an actual handheld picture of the moon:

http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/bf/1b/a83ac060ada0881604bad110.L.jpg

Good luck!

Roughly the same. They view each other as their biggest competition, I’m sure, so their new models are always trying to outdo the other.

The “best” camera is probably from the company that had the most recent release.

For a DSLR Nikon but for a point and shoot canon.